Noida; Table S3. Summary of TSS, VSS SMA of sludge biogas production price at UASB; Table S4. Summary of Heavy Metal at three STPs; Table S5. Heavy Metal Concentration in Dry UASB Digested Sludge of STPs; Figure S1. Variation of influent and effluent BOD of UASB reactor at diverse STPs; Figure S2. Variation of influent and effluent COD of UASB reactor at various STPs; Figure S3. Variation of TSS of sewage at unique STPs; Figure S4. Variation of sulfates in sewage at diverse STPs; Figure S5. Schematic layout of distinctive sampling areas in UASBPP method at 27; Figure S6. Schematic layout of different sampling areas in UASBPP system at 34 MLD STP, Noida. Competing interests The authors declare that they’ve no competing interest. Authors’ contributions All authors contributed considerably for the paper. AAK is main and corresponding author did the majority of the research function at web page and laboratory and performed the statistical analysis. RZG extensively participated in experimental and information analysis, data collection and ready the initial draft from the manuscript. AA Khan was involved in field studies.2072801-99-9 Formula IM is the professor who suggested the analysis system. AAK is another principal investigator who is a professor and guides the study. VD and BL would be the faculty member and connected as researcher who coordinated in drafting and designing the manuscript. All authors study and approved the final manuscript. Author details 1 Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Roorkee, Roorkee, India. 2Royal HaskoningDHV, New Delhi, India. 3School of Atmosphere and Natural Resources, Doon University, Dehradun, India. 4Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece. 5The Volcani Center, Institute of Agriculture Engineering, Bet Dagan 50250, Israel.2246363-82-4 In stock six Division of Civil Engineering, Ariel University, Ariel 40700, Israel.PMID:23910527 Received: 29 March 2013 Accepted: 30 November 2013 Published: 27 January 2014 References 1. Seghezzo L, Geeman G, van Lier JB, Hamelers HVM, Letinga G: A assessment, the anaerobic treatment of sewage in UASB and EGSB reactors. Bioresource Technol 1998, 65:17590. 2. Chernicharo CAL: Posttreatment alternatives for the anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Technol 2006, 5:732.Conclusions This quick screening study of 10 STPs of seven various cities confirmed that the general performances of STPs when it comes to BOD, COD and SS removal were ranged amongst 66 to 95 . The performance of UASB reactors at Saharanpur (38 MLD STP), Karnal (40 MLD STP), Vadodara (43 MLD STP) Noida (34 MLD) and Ludhiana (111 MLD STP) were ranged from 55 to 80 for removal of BOD, COD and TSS. This short investigation also highlighted the functionality of distinct post treatment choices presently installed at STP.The DHS as well as the activated sludge course of action wereefficient to remove organics and nitrogen from the UASB effluent. The treated effluent is inKhan et al. Journal of Environmental Wellness Science Engineering 2014, 12:43 http://www.ijehse.com/content/12/1/Page 13 of3.4.five.six.7. eight. 9.10. 11.12. 13.14.15.16. 17.18.19.20. 21.von Sperling M, Oliveira CM, Andrada GJB, Godinho VM, Assuncao FAL, Melo WRJ: Functionality evaluation of easy wastewater treatment method comprised by UASB reactor, shallow polishing ponds and rock filter. Wat Sci Technol 2008, 58(six):1313319. Khan AA, Gaur RZ, Tyagi VK, Khursheed A, Lew B, Mehrotra I, Kazmi AA: Sustainable solutions for post therapy of UASB effluent treating sewage: a.
